Preliminary quality of western Canadian barley 2021-2022
Part I. Barley production in 2021
Province | 2019 | 2020 | 10-year average*Footnote 1 | 2021**Footnote 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manitoba | 0.136 | 0.168 | 0.155 | 0.167 |
Saskatchewan | 1.275 | 1.264 | 1.029 | 1.500 |
Alberta and British Columbia | 1.467 | 1.512 | 1.409 | 1.590 |
Western Canada | 2.878 | 2.944 | 2.598 | 3.257 |
Canada | 2.996 | 3.060 | 2.733 | 3.357 |
Figure 1.1 Yearly comparison of total barley seeded area in western Canada

Province | 2019 | 2020 | 10-year average*Footnote 1 | 2021**Footnote 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manitoba | 0.529 | 0.686 | 0.528 | 0.480 |
Saskatchewan | 4.449 | 4.385 | 3.202 | 2.635 |
Alberta and British Columbia | 5.018 | 5.345 | 4.611 | 3.705 |
Western Canada | 9.996 | 10.416 | 8.353 | 6.820 |
Canada | 10.383 | 10.741 | 8.772 | 7.141 |
Figure 1.2 Yearly comparison of total barley production in western Canada

Province | 2019 | 2020 | 10-year average*Footnote 1 | 2021**Footnote 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manitoba | 76.9 | 79.9 | 68.6 | 58.8 |
Saskatchewan | 69.3 | 68.7 | 61.7 | 35.1 |
Alberta | 72.4 | 74.0 | 69.8 | 49.6 |
Western Canada | 71.1 | 71.8 | 66.6 | 43.2 |
Canada | 70.8 | 71.1 | 66.1 | 43.8 |
Figure 1.3 Yearly comparison of average barley yield in western Canada

Part II. Preliminary quality assessment
Variety | Grade | Location | Number of samples | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein content % dbFootnote 3 | Beta-glucan content % db | Test weight (kg/hL)Footnote 4 | Plumpness % >6/64” sieve | 1000 kernel weight (g) | |||||||||
Mean | SDFootnote 5 | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
AAC Connect | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 19 | 13.4 | 1.2 | 4.13 | 0.22 | 65.6 | 1.6 | 94.4 | 3.5 | 48.4 | 3.0 |
AAC Synergy | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 23 | 13.8 | 1.4 | 4.32 | 0.36 | 65.3 | 1.7 | 92.1 | 7.5 | 46.1 | 5.1 |
AC Metcalfe | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 8 | 14.8 | 1.1 | 4.46 | 0.5 | 65.8 | 1.9 | 95.0 | 2.1 | 46.5 | 3.2 |
CDC Copeland | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 22 | 13.8 | 1.9 | 3.84 | 0.40 | 64.6 | 1.1 | 94.7 | 4.4 | 45.8 | 3.2 |
Variety | Grade | Location | Number of samples | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein content % | Test weight (kg/hL) | Plumpness % >6/64” sieve | 1000 kernel weight (g) | ||||||||
Mean | SDFootnote 5 | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
CDC Austenson | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 27 | 13.7 | 1.3 | 66.2 | 1.9 | 93.6 | 3.6 | 46.8 | 4.2 |
No. 2 Western Canada | Western Canada | 8 | 14.4 | 1.2 | 62.7 | 2.7 | 83.8 | 15.6 | 41.6 | 4.2 | |
Conlon | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 8 | 15.3 | 1.7 | 65.5 | 1.8 | 89.7 | 8.9 | 44.7 | 5.0 |
Oreana | No. 1 Western Canada | Western Canada | 4 | 13.6 | 1.6 | 68.8 | 2.3 | 89.9 | 6.2 | 50.2 | 5.1 |
Variety/province | Number of samples | Tonnage represented by samplesFootnote 6 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test weight (kg/hL) | 1000 kernel weight (g) | Plumpness % >6/64” sieve | Hardness indexFootnote 7 | Protein (%)Footnote 8 | Germination energy 4mL (%) | Germination energy 8mL (%) | RVA (RVU)Footnote 9 | |||||||||
Mean | SDFootnote 5 | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | Mean | Mean | Min-Max Footnote 10 | |||
AAC Connect | ||||||||||||||||
All Prairies | 13 | 22,000 | 65.1 | 1.7 | 48.6 | 2.2 | 95.5 | 1.2 | 54 | 7 | 12.8 | 0.6 | 98 | 95 | 93 | 26-133 |
AAC Synergy | ||||||||||||||||
All Prairies | 12 | 135,000 | 65.7 | 1.6 | 47.2 | 2.8 | 96.7 | 1.3 | 56 | 7 | 12.6 | 0.8 | 98 | 96 | 91 | 17-139 |
AC Metcalfe | ||||||||||||||||
All Prairies | 3 | 14,000 | 67.0 | 1.3 | 44.4 | 1.9 | 95.9 | 2.1 | 64 | 1 | 13.7 | 0.9 | 99 | 97 | 85 | 14-145 |
CDC Copeland | ||||||||||||||||
All Prairies | 13 | 70,000 | 64.7 | 1.3 | 45.8 | 2.6 | 96.8 | 1.6 | 51 | 7 | 12.6 | 1.0 | 99 | 96 | 114 | 45-151 |
CDC Fraser | ||||||||||||||||
All Prairies | 13 | 10,500 | 65.0 | 0.5 | 46.2 | 1.8 | 96.9 | 1.3 | 62 | 3 | 12.9 | 0.7 | 99 | 96 | 104 | 93-116 |
Figure 2.1 Average protein content in barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021
-
Details
Average protein content in barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021 Crop years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 10-year average Protein, % 11.4 11.9 11.2 11.7 12.4 11.3 11.5 11.9 11.5 11.8 12.8 11.7
Figure 2.2 Average germination energy of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021
-
Details
Average germination energy of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021 Crop years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 10-year average Germination energy, 4 ml % 99 98 98 96 97 97 99 99 98 99 99 98
Figure 2.3 Average plumpness of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021
-
Details
Average plumpness of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021 Crop years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 10-year average Plumpness, over 6/64" sieve (%) g 93.2 88.4 93.1 93.3 94.5 93.1 93.6 95.6 92.7 92.4 96.3 93.0
Figure 2.4 Average 1000 kernel weight of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021
-
Details
Average 1000 kernel weight of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021 Crop years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 10-year average 1000 kernel weight, g 44.2 41.5 47.7 44.2 45.7 46.5 44.9 46.7 45.1 45.5 46.9 45.2
Figure 2.5 Average test weight of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021
-
Details
Average test weight of barley selected for malting from 2011 to 2021 Crop years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 10-year average Test weight, (kg/hL) 67.7 64.9 68.2 65.0 66.6 66.5 68.1 69.5 66.3 67.2 65.3 67.0
Figure 2.6 RVA results for barley selected for malting in 2021 in comparison with previous years

- Date modified: