Barley Harvest Annual Report 2022

Annual harvest survey of malting barley

On this page:

Sampling and survey methodology

The 2022 malting barley survey is based on varietal composites that represent about 1,795,000 tonnes of malting barley selected for domestic processing or for export. The grain handling and malting companies involved in the selection process were Cargill Ltd., Canada Malting Co. Ltd., Boortmalt, Rahr Malting Canada Ltd., Richardson International Ltd., Viterra Inc., and Malteurop Canada Ltd. The tonnage included in this survey represents only a portion of the total volume of malting barley selected in western Canada. Some samples included in this report came from the Canadian Grain Commission’s Harvest Sample Program. Samples were received from the beginning of harvest until November 15, 2022.

Quality of barley selected for malting in 2022: general trends

In 2022, the average protein content in malting barley was 12.3%. This is significantly lower than last year (13.2%) and slightly higher than the 10-year average (11.8%) (Figure 3.1). The average test weight was 66.7 kg/hL, which is higher than last year (64.8 kg/hL), and equal to the 10-year average (66.7 kg/hL) (Figure 3.2). The average 1000 kernel weight was 45.0 g, which is close to the 10-year average (45.3 g) (Figure 3.3). Kernel plumpness, measured by counting the number of kernels remaining on a 6/64” slotted screen, had an average value of 93.8%. This is lower than last year (96.1%) and close to the 10-year average (93.3%) (Figure 3.4). 2022 barley exhibited excellent average germination energy at 4 mL (99%) (Figure 3.5). In 2022, the average germination energy at 8 mL was 92%, which indicates very little water sensitivity (Fig. 3.6). The results presented in Figures 3.1 to 3.6 represent weighted averages based on the tonnage of composite samples received and analysed.

Comparison of physicochemical parameters in individual barley varieties

Kernel hardness was determined for individual varieties using a single kernel characterization system. The results indicated some differences among barley varieties (Figure 3.7). The length of kernels of different malting varieties is shown in Figure 3.8. AAC Connect was characterized by longer kernels compared to other varieties. The content of β-glucans in selected malting varieties grown in western Canada in 2022 is shown in Figure 3.9. Among the two-row varieties, CDC Copeland exhibited the lowest β-glucan content and AC Metcalfe the highest. The content of arabinoxylans in selected malting varieties grown in western Canada is shown in Figure 3.10. The yearly variations in 1000 kernel weight and grain protein level for several established and new malting barley varieties are presented in Figure 3.11 and Figure 3.12, respectively. The 1000 kernel weight of CDC Copper, CDC Copeland, CDC Churchill, and AC Metcalfe was slightly lower than last year. The kernel weight of AAC Connect, CDC Fraser, CDC Bow and AAC Synergy was high and similar to values observed last year. All varieties show substantially lower protein content in 2022 compared to last year.

Figure 3.1 Average protein content in barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Graph: Average protein content in barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022.
Details
Protein content (%, db)
2012 11.9
2013 11.2
2014 11.7
2015 12.4
2016 11.3
2017 11.5
2018 11.9
2019 11.5
2020 11.8
2021 13.2
2022 12.3
10-year average 11.8
Figure 3.2 Average test weight of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Graph: Average test weight of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022.
Details
Test weight (kg/hL)
2012 64.9
2013 68.2
2014 65.0
2015 66.6
2016 66.5
2017 68.1
2018 69.5
2019 66.3
2020 67.2
2021 64.8
2022 66.7
10-year average 66.7

Figure 3.3 Average 1000 kernel weight of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Graph: Average 1000 kernel weight of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022.
Details
1000 kernel weight (g)
2012 41.5
2013 47.7
2014 44.2
2015 45.7
2016 46.5
2017 44.9
2018 46.7
2019 45.1
2020 45.5
2021 45.3
2022 45.0
10-year average 45.3
Figure 3.4 Average plumpness of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Graph: Average plumpness of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Details
Plumpness, over 6/64’’ sieve (%)
2012 88.4
2013 93.1
2014 93.3
2015 94.5
2016 93.1
2017 93.6
2018 95.6
2019 92.7
2020 92.4
2021 96.1
2022 93.8
10-year average 93.3

Figure 3.5 Average germination energy (4ml) of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Graph: Average germination energy (4ml) of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022.
Details
Germination energy (%, 4 ml)
2012 98
2013 98
2014 96
2015 97
2016 97
2017 99
2018 99
2019 98
2020 99
2021 98
2022 99
10-year average 98
Figure 3.6 Average germination energy (8 ml) of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022
Graph: Average germination energy (8 ml) of barley selected for malting from 2012 to 2022.
Details
Germination energy (%, 8 ml)
2012 89
2013 92
2014 84
2015 86
2016 90
2017 96
2018 97
2019 89
2020 95
2021 93
2022 92
10-year average 91

Figure 3.7 Kernel hardness index for barley cultivars selected for malting in 2022 (sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets)
Graph: Kernel hardness index for barley cultivars selected for malting in 2022. Sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets.
Details
Hardness index
AAC Connect 57.9
AAC Synergy 53.3
CDC Fraser 51.2
CDC Churchill 50.8
AAC Connect 49.0
CDC Copeland 45.3
Figure 3.8 Kernel length for barley cultivars selected for malting in 2022 (sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets
Graph: Kernel length for barley cultivars selected for malting in 2022. Sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets.
Details
Kernel length (mm)
AAC Connect 9.10
AAC Synergy 8.92
CDC Fraser 8.91
CDC Churchill 8.76
CDC Copeland 8.71
AC Metcalfe 8.56

Figure 3.9 Content of β-glucans in selected barley cultivars in 2022 (sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets)
Graph: Content of β-glucans in selected barley cultivars in 2022. Sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets.
Details
ß-Glucan (%, db)
Legacy Celebration AC Metcalfe Cerveza AAC Synergy CDC Fraser Newdale AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Copper Bill Coors 100 CDC Churchill Sirish CDC Copeland
5.02 4.61 4.37 4.34 4.24 4.16 4.13 4.10 4.00 3.96 3.91 3.84 3.75 3.62
Figure 3.10 Content of arabinoxylans in selected barley cultivars in 2022 (sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets)
Graph: Content of arabinoxylans in selected barley cultivars in 2022. Sample numbers for each variety are indicated in brackets.
Details
Arabinoxylans (%,db)
Legacy CDC Copper Celebration Bill Coors 100 AC Metcalfe CDC Copeland Newdale CDC Churchill Cerveza AAC Synergy Sirish CDC Bow CDC Fraser AAC Connect
8.08 7.34 7.09 7.02 6.95 6.71 6.79 6.68 6.61 6.60 6.60 6.48 6.47 6.19

Figure 3.11 Comparison of the average 1000 kernel weight of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (values represent arithmetic averages; samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
Graph: Comparison of the average 1000 kernel weight of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022. Values represent arithmetic averages. Samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4.
Details
1000 kernel weight (g)
CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 45.2 44.1 47.0 50.0 53.6 NSFootnote1 NS
2018 47.0 45.5 48.1 53.0 49.6 54.7 NS
2019 45.3 43.3 47.6 51.1 49.7 49.5 NS
2020 44.7 44.0 47.6 49.5 48.7 48.7 47.5
2021 45.8 44.1 47.7 48.0 47.6 46.8 46.7
2022 43.8 42.7 47.0 48.3 47.3 47.4 43.8
Figure 3.12 Comparison of the average protein content in selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (values represent arithmetic averages; samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
Graph: Comparison of the average protein content in selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022. Values represent arithmetic averages. Samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4.
Details
Barley protein (%, db)
CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 11.3 11.7 11.2 11.3 11.1 NS NS
2018 11.8 12.3 11.6 11.0 10.8 11.3 NS
2019 11.4 12.2 10.9 11.1 10.4 10.5 NS
2020 11.7 12.3 11.5 11.8 10.9 11.3 10.6
2021 12.8 13.5 12.7 13.1 12.8 12.7 13.7
2022 12.1 12.6 11.9 12.1 12.1 12.0 11.9

Pre-harvest sprouting

Pre-harvest sprouting can occur when mature grain remains unharvested in the field during prolonged periods of wet weather. One of the enzymes produced very early during germination is α-amylase. Since the level of α-amylase in sound grain is very low compared to that in germinating grain, the content of α-amylase in grain can be used as a marker of germination. Rapid visco analysis (RVA) indirectly estimates the amount of α-amylase in barley by measuring the viscosity of ground barley in water. The viscosity results are expressed in Rapid Visco Units (RVU) which then can be converted to centipoise (cP) (1 RVU = 12 cP).

Barley selectors use RVA to identify sound, moderately and strongly pre-germinated barley, and to manage their supply accordingly. Samples with final viscosity values greater than 120 RVU are considered sound, and the probability that they will retain germination energy after storage is very high. Samples with RVA values of 50 to 120 RVU are moderately pre-germinated while samples with RVA values less than 50 RVU are substantially pre-germinated and have a high probability of losing germination energy during storage. They should be malted as soon as possible. To more accurately predict safe storage time, storage conditions (temperature and relative humidity) and the initial moisture content of the grain must be considered in addition to the RVA values.

The majority of barley grown in 2022 was generally very sound with average RVA values above 120 RVU. In certain areas of Saskatchewan, above average precipitation in August contributed to some pre-harvest sprouting. However, generally warm and dry harvest conditions on the prairies resulted in sound grain with high RVA values. (Figure 3.13).

Figure 3.13 Rapid visco analysis (RVA) results for barley selected for malting in 2022 in comparison with previous years

Rapid visco analysis (RVA) results for barley selected for malting in 2022 in comparison with previous years.

The boxes in the graph show the range of RVA values in the middle 50% of the analysed samples; the horizontal line and the dot inside the box indicate the median and mean, respectively. The "x" outside of the box marks the minimum and maximum values.

Risk of germination loss in storage
Risk of germination loss in storage Rapid visco analysis Viscosity (Rapid Visco Units)
Low ≥ 120
Intermediate 50 to 120
High < 50
Details
RVA (RVU)
  2020 2021 2022
Alberta 129 82 132
Saskatchewan 134 81 107
Manitoba 119 72 124

Malting conditions and methodologies

Initial malting trials indicated that during steeping, barley from 2022 did not absorb water as easily as last year’s barley. Several factors contributed to somewhat slower water absorption, including higher test weight, higher kernel density, and a greater degree of soundness. Consequently, the second wet steeping cycle was increased from 7 hours in 2021 to 9 hours in 2022. In addition, samples of barley varieties with large kernel size and weight were sprayed with water during germination to achieve adequate hydration levels and modification. Similar to last year, the steeping temperature was 14 ºC and the entire germination process (96 hours) was conducted at 15 ºC. The kilning steps were conducted according to the same schedules as last year. All the analytical methods used to assess barley, malt and wort quality in this survey are listed in Malting barley methods used to measure quality.

Table 3.1 Comparison of micromalting conditions used with the Grain Research Laboratory Phoenix Micromalting System in 2021 and 2022
Steeping 2021 2022
First wet cycle 9 hours 9 hours
First dry cycle 14 hours 14 hours
Second wet cycle 7 hours 9 hours
Second dry cycle 14 hours 14 hours
Temperature 14 °C 14 °C
Germination 96 hours at 15 °C 96 hours at 15 °C
Kilning 12 hours at 60-65°C, 6 hours at 65°C, 2 hours at 75 °C, 5 hours at 83-85 °C, 2 hours at 60 °C, 2 hours at 40 °C 12 hours at 60-65°C, 6 hours at 65°C, 2 hours at 75 °C, 5 hours at 83-85 °C, 2 hours at 60 °C, 2 hours at 40 °C

Malting quality in 2022: varietal and yearly comparisons

Figures 3.14 to 3.19 compare the average values of malt proteins, fine extract, malt diastatic power, malt α-amylase, wort free amino nitrogen (FAN), and wort β-glucans among varieties annually evaluated in our survey since 2017. Values shown in the graphs represent the arithmetic averages. This year, we received a limited number of CDC Copper samples, and as a result, this variety is not included in our varietal comparison.

Figure 3.14 Comparison of the average protein content in selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (values represent arithmetic averages; samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
average values of malt proteins
Details
Malt protein (%, db)
  CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 11.4 11.9 11.2 11.3 11.0 NS NS
2018 12.2 12.5 11.9 11.2 10.8 11.2 NS
2019 11.7 12.2 11.0 11.1 10.4 10.7 NS
2020 11.7 12.1 11.3 11.7 10.8 11.3 11.0
2021 12.9 13.6 12.5 13.1 12.6 12.6 NS
2022 11.9 12.2 11.4 11.7 11.5 11.8 11.4
Figure 3.15 Comparison of the average extract levels from the malt of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
average extract levels from malt
Details
Fine extract (%, db)
CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 80.7 81.0 81.2 81.7 82.3 NS NS
2018 80.6 81.3 81.0 82.1 82.3 82.1 NS
2019 81.0 81.2 81.9 82.8 82.6 82.7 NS
2020 80.3 80.7 81.0 81.6 81.8 81.6 81.8
2021 78.5 78.6 79.0 79.4 79.7 79.3 NS
2022 80.5 80.6 81.3 82.0 81.1 81.8 81.6

Figure 3.16 Comparison of the average diastatic power in the malt of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
average diastatic power in malt
Details
Malt diastatic power (°, db)
  CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 144 168 154 167 153 NS NS
2018 155 181 155 160 148 179 NS
2019 163 198 161 166 154 165 NS
2020 157 191 163 172 153 174 146
2021 173 191 168 188 176 187 NS
2022 169 196 166 185 171 191 160
Figure 3.17 Comparison of the average activity of α-amylase in the malt of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
average activity of α-amylase in malt
Details
Malt alpha amylase (DU, db)
  CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 66.8 84.2 74.0 82.2 73.0 NS NS
2018 74.1 94.7 77.3 70.5 74.3 81.4 NS
2019 67.0 87.5 73.1 72.3 72.5 68.6 NS
2020 74.3 94.6 82.9 85.8 87.5 83.8 76.4
2021 76.1 90.1 78.8 87.0 81.5 90.5 NS
2022 68.7 83.2 73.1 80.9 78.0 79.7 77.7

Figure 3.18 Comparison of the average FAN level in wort produced from the malt of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
average FAN level in wort produced from malt
Details
Wort FAN (mg/L)
  CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 177 192 179 141 175 NS NS
2018 178 191 161 137 198 185 NS
2019 186 200 170 157 207 186 NS
2020 183 199 170 163 194 188 160
2021 221 232 191 177 242 229 NS
2022 209 215 191 185 214 211 190
Figure 3.19 Comparison of the average β-glucan concentration in wort produced from the malt of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022 (samples for CDC Bow are limited to 4)
Comparison of the average β-glucan concentration in wort produced from the malt of selected barley varieties from 2017 to 2022
Details
Wort β-glucan (mg/L)
  CDC Copeland AC Metcalfe AAC Synergy AAC Connect CDC Bow CDC Fraser CDC Churchill
2017 79 63 45 63 75 NS NS
2018 89 93 79 71 80 77 NS
2019 109 122 107 108 110 99 NS
2020 84 85 67 79 85 67 85
2021 76 79 70 76 71 67 NS
2022 89 98 87 95 85 93 99

Highlights of malting barley quality in 2022

  • The favourable growing conditions across the prairie provinces in 2022 significantly improved barley production and yield, and restocked the supply of Canadian malting barley for both the domestic and international markets.
  • In 2022, CDC Copeland and AAC Synergy were the predominant cultivars of malting barley in western Canada, but the area seeded with CDC Copeland continued to decline. The popularity of newer varieties (AAC Connect, CDC Fraser, and CDC Churchill) increased noticeably whereas the area seeded with AC Metcalfe continued to decline.
  • The favourable growing conditions had positive effects on the quality of malting barley. The average level of barley proteins was 12.3% in 2022, which is considerably lower than in 2021 (13.2%).
  • Barley in 2022 exhibited an excellent average germination energy of 99% with no water sensitivity.
  • The average 1000 kernel weight in 2022 was 45.0 g, which is close to the 10-year average (45.3 g). The newer varieties with kernels larger than AC Metcalfe and CDC Copeland contributed to the overall high average kernel weight.
  • In 2022, the average test weight of barley was 66.7 kg/hL, which is higher than in 2021 (64.8 kg/hL) and equal to the 10-year average. The average plumpness was 93.8%, which is lower than in 2021 (96.1%) but higher than the 10-year average (93.3%).
  • The majority of barley grown in 2022 was generally very sound with average RVA values above 120 RVU.
  • The combination of higher test weight and lower plumpness values in 2022 barley resulted in higher grain density, which required a slightly longer steeping time to achieve adequate modification of barley during the malting process.
  • Well-modified malt was obtained from 2022 barley with adequate levels of enzymes (diastatic power and α-amylase), soluble proteins, and free amino nitrogen (FAN).
  • A lower concentration of grain protein in 2022 barley contributed to about 1.5% higher malt extract levels compared to 2021.