Language selection

Search

Quality of Canada Western Amber Durum in 2024

This report presents harvest quality data for Canada Western Amber Durum (CWAD) wheat grown in 2024. Wheat samples were submitted to the Canadian Grain Commission’s Harvest Sample Program by producers. Quality data is compiled from the results of analytical tests performed in the Grain Research Laboratory.

Canada Western Amber Durum

CWAD is the second largest wheat class grown in western Canada. CWAD is used in a wide variety of products, including long and short dried pasta, fresh pasta, sheeted pasta, couscous and baked bread. CWAD has superior milling quality, producing high semolina yield with low ash content and speck count. It also has the high yellow pigment content necessary to produce end products with a bright yellow colour. The high protein content and strong gluten characteristics of CWAD ensures superior pasta cooking quality and good performance in durum bread.

Summary of CWAD quality in 2024

The quality of CWAD was generally good, with more than 70% of the crop in the top two grades. Test weight was the main downgrading factor due to the dry and hot conditions in major durum growing regions during the grain filling and ripening stages. Mean protein content was 15.3%, slightly higher than in 2023 and significantly higher than the ten-year average of 14.3%. The crop was safe and sound, with more than 99% of CWAD samples having DON levels less than 1.0 ppm and 96% of samples having FN values greater than 350 seconds. Transcend remained the top CWAD variety grown in 2024. New varieties, such as CDC Defy, AAC Stronghold, and AAC Grainland, have increased in acreage in recent years while Transcend acreage is gradually decreasing.

Grade distribution

No. 1 CWAD:
and No. 2 CWAD
72.6%

More information


Protein

Protein content:
15.3%

More information

Deoxynivalenol (DON)

DON < 1.0 ppm:
99.3%

More information

Falling Number (FN)

FN > 350 seconds:
96.2%

More information

Variety

Top varieties:

  • Transcend
  • CDC Defy
  • AAC Stronghold
  • CDC Precision
  • AAC Grainland

Figure 1  Top CWAD varieties grown in western Canada from 2020 to 2024
Figure 1 Top CWAD varieties grown in western Canada from 2020 to 2024
Graph data
% of total
Variety 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Transcend 39 35 32 29 22
CDC Precision 16 16 16 14 9
Brigade 10 8 8 6 4
AAC Spitfire 9 8 7 5 4
CDC Alloy 4 7 7 6 5
AAC Stronghold 2 7 8 9 11
AAC Grainland 0 1 4 6 7
CDC Defy 0 0 2 8 17
Figure 2  Grade distribution and grading factors for CWAD as of November 7, 2024 (based on 851 samples)
Grade distribution and grading factors for CWAD as of November 7, 2024 (based on 851 samples)
Graph data
% of samples
Parameter No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 ≤ No. 4
Grade distribution 45.1 27.5 12.2 15.2
Test weight 0 18 8.8 0
Hard vitreous kernels 0 7 1.6 0
Figure 3  Mean protein content (13.5% mb, %) in CWAD from 2015 to November 7, 2024
Figure 3 Mean protein content (13.5% mb, %) in CWAD from 2015 to Nov 7, 2024
Graph data
Protein
Year %
2015 14.0
2016 12.7
2017 13.6
2018 14.3
2019 14.0
2020 13.8
2021 15.7
2022 14.6
2023 14.9
2024 15.3

Milling and functional quality

In 2024, CWAD had very high protein levels, very high yellow pigment content and superior pasta processing quality. The hard vitreous kernel (HVK) content was excellent for all grades, including No.1 CWAD at 92%. Test weight and weight per thousand kernels for No.1 CWAD were comparable to 2023. No. 2 CWAD had the same test weight but lower weight per thousand kernels than in 2023 and No. 4 CWAD had both lower test weight and weight per thousand kernels. The 2024 CWAD crop was very sound and all aggregate wheat samples had FN values greater than 400 seconds. Ash content in wheat was higher than in 2023 for all grades.

Total milling yield and semolina yield in the 2024 CWAD aggregates were lower than in 2023 for each grade. This was largely due to the smaller kernels produced under the dry and hot 2024 growing conditions. All semolina samples were very clean with low speck count and large granulation. Semolina ash was slightly higher for all grades compared to last year. Rheological tests demonstrated strong and balanced gluten properties based on gluten index and Alveogram parameters. The pasta produced from semolina milled from all grades of 2024 CWAD had an excellent bright yellow color, high firmness and superior cooking quality.

Harvest quality data for CWAD prairie aggregates Footnote 1

Prairies aggregate are from all durum producing regions in Saskatchewan and Alberta (regions 12 to 15 on the crop region map).

In 2024, No. 2 CWAD and No. 4 CWAD were downgraded due to test weight. Based on the Official Grain Grading Guide's export grade determination table for CWAD, the minimum test weight for No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 CWAD is 80 kg/hL, 79 kg/hL, 78 kg/hL and 75 kg/hL, respectively.

Wheat
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
Test weight, kg/hL 81 79 77 81 79 79
Weight per 1000 kernels, g 38.2 33.3 30.9 37.2 36.8 37.4
Vitreous kernels, % 92 82 82 95 86 78
Protein content, % 14.1 15.3 16.8 14.7 14.6 15.0
Ash content, % 1.61 1.70 1.75 1.44 1.51 1.55
Falling Number, seconds 473 434 427 438 428 379
Cadmium content, mg/kg 0.055 0.054 0.060 0.067 0.068 0.063
Milling - Allis-Chalmers Mill
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
Total milling yield, % 72.1 71.3 69.2 73.2 72.4 71.6
Semolina yield, % 64.4 63.2 61.1 65.9 65.5 64.9
Semolina Footnote 2
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
Protein content, % 13.4 14.2 15.8 14.0 14.0 14.2
Protein loss, % 0.7 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.8
Wet gluten content, % 33.9 35.0 37.9 34.7 33.5 34.5
Gluten index, % 84 88 88 80 79 72
Ash content, % 0.77 0.81 0.85 0.72 0.75 0.77
Yellow pigment content, ppm 11.2 11.5 11.7 10.8 11.0 11.4
Yellowness, b* 33.6 32.8 32.7 33.2 33.0 32.5
Granulation
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
> 425 µm, % 9.7 9.3 8.9 8.1 8.6 8.6
> 250 µm, % 58.4 56.6 55.0 60.0 60.1 58.5
> 180 µm, % 18.9 19.2 19.4 18.5 17.5 17.7
> 150 µm, % 5.5 5.8 6.2 6.2 6.1 6.3
< 150 µm, % 7.6 9.1 10.6 7.2 7.6 9.0
Semolina speck count per 50 cm 2
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
Total specks 9 9 4 8 11 14
Dark specks 1 2 0 1 3 2
Large specks (≥ 0.06 mm 2) 4 4 2 3 5 7
Alveogram Footnote 3
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
P (maximum over pressure), mm H2O 93 94 105 94 96 98
L (length), mm 96 96 103 87 83 82
P/L 0.97 0.98 1.02 1.08 1.16 1.20
W (deformation energy), 10 -4 joules 269 276 335 245 243 242
le (elasticity Index), % 51.3 52.4 55.4 48.3 47.9 47.1
Spaghetti colour dried at 85°C
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
Brightness, L* 71.3 70.1 69.8 71.1 70.4 69.8
Redness, a* 6.8 7.7 8.1 7.2 7.8 8.5
Yellowness, b* 65.8 65.4 65.3 64.0 64.0 63.7
Spaghetti texture dried at 85°C
Quality parameter 2024 2023
No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD
Peak cutting force, g 601 641 757 697 680 676
Dry strand diameter, mm 1.71 1.71 1.72 1.71 1.71 1.71
Cooked strand diameter, mm 2.52 2.52 2.52 2.53 2.53 2.53

Protein data by grade and by province

Figure 4  Distribution of protein content (13.5%  mb, %) in CWAD from 2022 to November 7, 2024
Figure 4 Distribution of protein content (13.5% mb, %) in CWAD from 2022 to Nov 7th, 2024
Graph data
% of samples
Protein range, % 2022 2023 2024
< 12.0% 9.8 8.2 10.6
12.0-12.9% 15.4 5.6 11.4
13.0-13.9% 18.4 14.5 14.4
14.0-14.9% 21.2 21.1 14.1
> 15.0% 35.2 50.6 49.4
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 1 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Province Number of samples Mean SD
Manitoba NS Footnote * NS NS
Saskatchewan 324 14.1 1.8
Alberta and B.C. 75 14.7 1.3
Western Canada 400 14.2 1.8
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 2 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Province Number of samples Mean SD
Manitoba NS NS NS
Saskatchewan 198 15.2 2.3
Alberta and B.C. 47 15.0 1.9
Western Canada 247 15.2 2.2
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 3 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Province Number of samples Mean SD
Manitoba NS NS NS
Saskatchewan 77 16.3 2.5
Alberta and B.C. 34 16.3 1.9
Western Canada 112 16.3 2.3
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 4 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Province Number of samples Mean SD
Manitoba NS NS NS
Saskatchewan NS NS NS
Alberta and B.C. NS NS NS
Western Canada 23 14.9 3.1
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 5 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Province Number of samples Mean SD
Manitoba NS NS NS
Saskatchewan 107 18.3 1.9
Alberta and B.C. NS NS NS
Western Canada 113 18.2 1.9
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , all grades, CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Province Number of samples Mean SD
Manitoba NS NS NS
Saskatchewan 726 15.3 2.5
Alberta and B.C. 165 15.2 1.8
Western Canada 895 15.3 2.4

Protein data by grade and by crop region

Four crop regions in western Canada were designated for Canada Western Amber Durum (CWAD) based on similarity of environmental characteristics within each region. Consideration was given to directional movement, political boundaries and production (seeded area) in choosing these regions. In addition, areas with a low level of production were grouped with larger production areas to ensure sufficient sample volume for analysis.

Canada Western Amber Durum (CWAD) crop regions
Text description
  • Region 12: southeastern Saskatchewan
  • Region 13: southwestern Saskatchewan
  • Region 14: central Saskatchewan
  • Region 15: Alberta
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 1 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Region Number of samples Mean Standard deviation
11 NS Footnote * NS NS
12 108 14.3 1.8
13 192 14.1 1.9
14 24 13.3 1.6
15 75 14.7 1.3
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 2 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Region Number of samples Mean Standard deviation
11 NS NS NS
12 96 14.7 2.2
13 77 15.9 2.3
14 25 14.8 2.1
15 47 15 1.9
Protein content (%) Footnote 4 , No. 3 CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Region Number of samples Mean Standard deviation
11 NS NS NS
12 47 15.9 2.6
13 24 17.4 1.8
14 NS NS NS
15 34 16.3 1.9

Grading factor data

Producer samples submitted to the Harvest Sample Program are graded based on the Official Grain Grading Guide. The data below summarizes the occurrence and frequency of wheat grading factors. Downgrading can be due to 1 or more grading factors present in the same sample.

Grading factors present (%) in Canada Western Amber Durum wheat from all provinces as of December 2, 2024

Samples No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 5 CWAD
Number of samples 400 247 112 23 113
% of total 44.7 27.6 12.5 2.6 12.6
Grading factor No. 1 CWAD No. 2 CWAD No. 3 CWAD No. 4 CWAD No. 5 CWAD
Broken (BKN) 0.0 0.8 3.6 0.0 0.9
Ergot (ERG) 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.9
Fusarium damage (FUS DMG) 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0
Grass green kernels (GRASS GR) 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Hard vitreous kernels (HVK) 0.0 25.5 14.3 43.5 0.0
Midge damage (MDGE) 0.0 12.6 0.9 0.0 0.9
Mildew (MIL) 0.0 4.0 1.8 4.3 0.9
Matter other than cereal grains (MOTCG) 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.9
Non-registered variety (NON REGV) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9
Severe midge damage (SEVMDGE) 0.0 7.3 3.6 0.0 0.0
Severely sprouted kernels (SEVSPTD) 0.0 3.6 6.3 8.7 0.0
Shrunken kernels (SHR) 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 94.7
Sprouted kernels (SPTD) 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0
Total foreign material (TFM) 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.9
Total Shrunken and Broken (TSHRBKN) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1
Total sprouted (TSPTD) 0.0 2.4 1.8 4.3 0.9
Test weight (TWT) 0.0 64.4 71.4 30.4 3.5
Wheat of other classes (WOOC) 0.0 7.3 3.6 26.1 0.0

Deoxynivalenol (DON) data

Deoxynivalenol (DON) is a mycotoxin that can be found in grain infected with Fusarium head blight. DON is not an official grading factor listed in the Canada Grain Regulations or the Official Grain Grading Guide. Instead, the Canadian Grain Commission uses the visual assessment of Fusarium damaged kernels as a proxy for DON.

Even if DON isn’t an official grading factor, it may be included as a contract specification in grain transactions. The Canadian Grain Commission provides DON results to producers who participate in the Harvest Sample Program.

Distribution of deoxynivalenol values for CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Figure 5 description to follow
Graph data
Distribution of deoxynivalenol values for CWAD as of December 2, 2024
DON (ppm) %
< 0.3 92.4
0.3 to 1.0 6.9
> 1.0 0.22
Deoxynivalenol (DON) values ( ppm) in Canada Western Amber Durum wheat as of December 2, 2024
DON ( ppm) Number of samples % of total
Below limit (< 0.3 ppm) 829 92.42
0.3 to 1.0 62 6.91
1.1 to 2.0 4 0.45
2.1 to 3.0 1 0.11
3.1 to 4.0 0 0
4.1 to 5.0 0 0
5.1 to 6.0 0 0
Above limit (> 6.0 ppm) 1 0.11
Total samples 897 100

Falling Number (FN) data

Falling Number (FN) results are an indicator of sprout damage in wheat. FN is not an official grading factor listed in the Canada Grain Regulations or the Official Grain Grading Guide. Instead, the Canadian Grain Commission uses the visual assessment of sprouted and severely sprouted kernels as a proxy for FN.

Even if FN isn’t an official grading factor, it may be included as a contract specification in grain transactions. The Canadian Grain Commission provides FN results to producers who participate in the Harvest Sample Program.

Distribution of Falling Number values for CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Figure 6 description to follow
Graph data
Distribution of Falling Number values for CWAD as of December 2, 2024
Falling Number % of samples
> 351 95.9
301 to 350 2.1
251 to 300 0.7
< 250 1.3
Falling Number values (seconds) in Canada Western Amber Durum wheat as of December 2, 2024
Falling Number (seconds) Number of samples % of total
> 450 535 59.58
401 to 450 262 29.18
351 to 400 64 7.13
301 to 350 19 2.12
251 to 300 6 0.67
201 to 250 5 0.56
151 to 200 1 0.11
101 to 150 3 0.33
61 to 100 3 0.33
60 0 0
Total samples 898 100

"Page details"

Date modified: